NEXUMDocs

Base plates and anchors

Base plate design: plate, anchors, pedestal and the loads
Base plate design: plate, anchors, pedestal and the loads

What you define#

Analytical method#

AISC Design Guide 1 (3rd ed.)

ACI 318-19 Chapter 17 for the anchors, by groups as IDEA StatiCa does: overlapping cones, the exact projected area ANc, ψec on each axis.

CheckClause
Steel in tension and shear (×0.8 with grout)§17.6.1, §17.7.1
Concrete breakout in tension (group, ψed, reduced hef with three near edges)§17.6.2
Pullout§17.6.3
Side-face blowout§17.6.4
Bond (adhesive anchors)§17.6.5
Concrete breakout in shear toward the pedestal edge§17.7.2
Pryout§17.7.3
Tension–shear interaction (exponent 5/3)§17.8
Shear lug: bearing φ·1.7·f′c·A_ef, breakout, lug bending and weld§17.11

When concrete breakout still fails, ACI §17.5.2.1 allows anchor reinforcement instead; Nexum flags it but does not design it.

Anchor types#

TypeFamilyPullout / bondNotes
Rod with heavy hex nutCast-inNp = 8·Abrg·f′c (§17.6.3.2.2a)Default
Rod with nut and anchor plateCast-inNp = 8·Abrg·f′c, Abrg = side² − πd²/4Plate size editable; warning if thinner than its overhang
Headed stud (Nelson H4L)Cast-inNp with the catalog head (5/8"–1")Ase of the unthreaded shank; AWS D1.1 Type B
L and J hookCast-inNp = 0.9·f′c·eh·da (§17.6.3.2.2b)No side-face blowout; AISC advises against hooks in tension
U anchorCast-inEach leg as a hook with eh = s/2Nexum's criterion: ACI 318 has no U type
AdhesivePost-installedBond, Nba = τcr·π·da·hefτcr, τuncr, kc and category are manufacturer data (ESR, ACI 355.4)
Expansion (torque-controlled)Post-installedNp,cr from the ESRφ by category
UndercutPost-installedNp,cr from the ESRESR often gives kc = 24

All checks, the FE and CBFEM models, the anchor table, the 3D model, the drawing (with an anchor sheet showing hef, eh, the plate or head) and fabrication come from the same anchor definition.

CBFEM model#

In CBFEM the plate, column and ribs are shells; anchors are springs with the IDEA StatiCa curve up to φNsa (tension only, length = ½ nut + washer + plate + grout + 8d); the concrete is a compression-only support with IDEA's subsoil stiffness.

Why DG1 and CBFEM differ#

DG1 assumes the concrete at its maximum stress in a block against the plate edge — the longest possible lever arm, a plastic lower bound. CBFEM, like IDEA StatiCa, spreads the compression elastically under the plate and close to the column, so the arm is shorter and the anchors take more tension. As the load approaches the strength both converge. For thin plates the FE value is the representative one; a thicker plate brings both closer. The Compare tool shows the two side by side with this explanation.

Base plate checks with CBFEM
Base plate checks with CBFEM

Try it on your own connection. Designing and calculating are free; the 14-day trial unlocks reports and drawings.

Open NexumSee pricing